Monday, April 29, 2013

Foster Kids on Psychotropic Drugs


House Bill 915

               Texas House Bill 915 introduced by state representative Louis Kolkhorst has been approved through legislation. The Bill is set for final approval by the Senate on Friday April 26th, 2013. If approved the Bill would require that prior to a foster child being put on psychotropic medications, the guardian of the child must receive written or verbal information from a medical provider on the child’s health situation.

                  The state system currently in place  is set up by placing all foster children in a single Medicaid managed care organization under STAR Heath, which has a “health passport” system to track the children’s medical histories. Guardians for all foster children receiving any medical treatment should be looking at ways to address the underlying distress causing possible  behavioral problems ,other than looking for a short term fix through prescription drugs. Although guardians are already required to consent to the prescription of psychotropic medications, the legislation would define what that consent actually means. Advocates on the new bill are intent to see that the legislation follow through on making sure that guardians are educated on the child’s treatment plan and would hold the guardians, medical providers and judicial courts more responsible for monitoring the child’s overall well-being.

                    The possible benefits and potential negative effects and outcomes of psychotropic medications used to treat the condition would be addressed to the guardian as well as other alternatives to help aid the child. Included in HB915 is a condition requiring a report on medical visits every 90 days to keep an eye on the effects of the medications on the child.  This will set up a course of action to educate children 16 and older whom have received consent from a court on allowing their own medical care.

                    The overmedication of foster children with psychotropic drugs has been a hot issue in the state. For example, one foster child described in a report about being prescribed 11 medications in one month, including two antidepressants and two stimulants to treat ADHD at a cost of $1,088 to the state’s Medicaid program. (released 2004 by Carole Keeton called the "Forgotten Children.") There is much needed action to inform the older children on the details of psychotropic drugs as well as on their treatment plans. In result of poor informed children,  many  foster children are resentful of the medication and stop taking it when they age out of the system and are more highly likely to develop withdrawal symptoms resulting in the use of illegal drugs.

                    On a side note when HB 915 was in committee, some medical professionals expressed concern that the legislation would create an administrative burden on the already limited network of mental health providers. Kolkhorst, the main author of the bill informed the committee she will work with medical groups to improve the bill and address such concerns. As a  believer in  the cause, the dedication to the bill from Kolkhorst  shows the willingness she is giving to bring this bill a positive outcome. I agree with the bill and feel that even with not only foster kids, any youth under 18 should be fully educated on what they are going to be taking and are diagnosed with. The parents , doctors and  the school should be educated and informed on the specifics child's medical history to prevent any miss use, and risk of a child being over medicated. I hope to see more action being taken in this matter and encourage the lawmakers and care takers of the children  to see the importance of this bill .The positive impact of House Bill 915 could bring aid  and a voice to those who need help the most. Just one child being helped  would be the start on the road to success.

Monday, April 15, 2013

Critique

Reply to Article:

 Unplanned Parenthood

 
               The Senate Bill 521 is something I personally do not agree on. I agree with Jamie's point of view  that it is a step backwards for Sex Education. I think that the stress needs to not only be on unwanted pregnancies and information for contraceptives but also, I feel as thou teens would benefit from more of an overall course pointing out the realities of their actions . In addition the school should offer guidance and  relief of pure pressure to those whom choose abstinence. The article expresses her opinion well and there is voice to the topic which allows me, the reader to relate to what Jamie is writing about. I would only suggest that the article would have more detail on to what might be a better course of action in opposing the bill. In all I do believe it was a great article informing the reader about the bill and her opinion on Senate Bill 512.

 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Targeting Sex Education Laws

Senate Bill 521
          State republican Senator Ken Paxton has filed the Senate Bill 521. The Bill will prohibit school districts from using materials supplied by pro-abortion organization for sex education classes in schools.
          For example local school district Austin ISD has received materials from such organizations such as planed parenthood to help with the education of Sex Ed courses. Bill 521 wants to instead promote abstinence and not inform students about the proper use of contraceptives.
          Besides the attack on organizations contributing to the districts Sex Ed courses, the Bill would like to change the current law that allows the parents the choice to opt out their child from the Sex Ed class offered by the school. Instead, the bill if approved, would like to do just the opposite and have the parent write a written consent letter to the school allowing their child to attend the class.
          I believe that the education of Sex Ed courses in schools is a positive program that educates the young of the responsibilities and sometimes consequences of his or her actions involving sex. Presentation is key in the subject of Sex Ed. If the curriculum comes across as unrealistic, untreatable or scaring the student they will not respond well to the information given and continue to let negative influences like media contribute to the decisions they make on sex.
          I think it would be more beneficial to tie Sex Ed courses into a health class curriculum that goes more in depth with the actions of having sex at a young age instead of the onetime video that we are all familiar with. I believe it would be a good idea if during the health course the students learned the finical responsibilities that come with a child. Also learning the emotional and physical toll that a child can have on young teens. Youths today if not receiving a mature and open conversation with their parents are more than likely receiving information from the media which sometimes has a poor outlook.
          The legislator should consider making the law for the individual counties or districts to vote on whether or not they want to adopt such a method. Different demographics throughout the districts might show more positive feedback using other methods.